What an Ethics of Discourse and Recognition Can Contribute to a Critical Theory of Refugee Claim Adjudication
Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory
Thanks to Axel Honneth, recognition theory has become a prominent fixture of critical social theory. In recent years, he has deployed his recognition theory in diagnosing pathologies and injustices that afflict institutional practices. Some of these institutional practices revolve around specifically juridical institutions, such as human rights and democratic citizenship, that directly impact the lives of the most desperate migrants. Hence it is worthwhile asking what recognition theory can add to a critical theory of migration. In this paper, I argue that, although its contribution to a critical theory of migration is limited, it nonetheless carves out a unique body of ethical insights related to diagnosing the interpretative and epistemic pathologies and injustices associated with the legal processing of migrants’ claims for asylum. Going beyond discourse ethics, which mainly highlights procedural violations of legislative and judicial deliberation, it trains our gaze on the institutional biases that lead migrants to be misrecognized or under-recognized as credible witnesses to their own refugee status.
Ingram, David. What an Ethics of Discourse and Recognition Can Contribute to a Critical Theory of Refugee Claim Adjudication. Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory, , : 19-46, 2021. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72732-1_2
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
Courts Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Immigration Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Litigation Commons, Organizational Communication Commons, Philosophy Commons
Author Posting.© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer, Cham for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Studies in Global Justice, Volume 21, 08 July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72732-1_2