Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

Authors

Fred B. Bryant, Loyola University ChicagoFollow
Rachael Millstein Coakley, Harvard Medical School
Grayson Holmbeck, Loyola University ChicagoFollow
Paul R. Yarnold, Optimal Data Analysis, LLC

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-17-2010

Publication Title

Optimal Data Analysis

Volume

1

Pages

55-58

Publisher Name

Optimal Data Analysis LLC

Abstract

Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20% more parsimonious, 3.6% more accurate and 30% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.

Comments

Author Posting © Optimal Data Analysis LLC, 2010. This article is posted here by permission of Optimal Data Analysis LLC for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in Optimal Data Analysis, Volume 1, September 2010, https://odajournal.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/v1.pdf

Recommended Citation

Bryant, Fred B.; Millstein Coakley, Rachael; Holmbeck, Grayson; and Yarnold, Paul R.. Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida. Optimal Data Analysis, 1, : 55-58, 2010. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Psychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works,

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

Copyright Statement

© Optimal Data Analysis LLC, 2010.