About Open Access
What Is Open Access?
"Open access" is a term used to describe information which can be freely accessed by anyone, regardless of institutional affiliation, academic credentials, race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, age, gender, disability, marital status, or any other classification.
Open access represents the democratization of information as a public good in the service of furthering human progress. The values espoused by the open access philosophy closely mirror Loyola’s mission, which speaks to the need for "knowledge in the service of humanity" and "learning and leadership in openhanded and generous ways to ensure freedom of inquiry, the pursuit of truth and care for others."
Loyola eCommons is a tangible expression of these core values, sharing a wealth of scholarly information, research, and creative works produced at Loyola with a global academic audience.
Why Choose Open Access?
Open access has the ability to open up new audiences for scholarly content, especially scholars at smaller institutions, community colleges, or in developing countries, who may have limited or no access to increasingly expensive academic journals and databases. Numerous studies have shown that open-access articles are cited more frequently than those published in traditional subscription-only journals, which means that the fruits of the research process are more widely used and make a greater contribution to their discipline.
Open-access dissemination is also required for research that is publicly funded through government agencies such as the National Institute of Health.
Myths About Open Access
A number of myths about open access publishing and author "self-archiving" (posting copies of articles on personal web sites or in an academic archive such as eCommons) continue to pervade academia:
- Open access = losing control of your work
Faculty are often concerned that freely disseminating research online can lead to a loss of control over how their work is used. However, open-access materials have the same copyright protections as those printed on paper – open access only changes the method of distribution, not the author’s rights.
- Open access = no peer review
Some fear that open access means the erosion of the peer review process. In reality, open access is a fundamentally separate issue from peer-review; it is a decision on how to disseminate information rather than how it should be edited. The Directory of Open-Access Journals lists over 5,500 open-access scholarly journals that exercise peer review or editorial quality control.
- Open access is harming society publishers
Another popular misconception is that open-access publishing or author self-archiving will threaten the revenue streams of scholarly societies, leading to less funding for research and diminished quality control. However, hundreds of scholarly societies have endorsed open-access dissemination or now have open-access publishing options.
The University Libraries strongly urge faculty to consider publishing in an open-access journal (or choosing an open-access publishing option from a traditional journal publisher) or repository, where all articles are freely available online. Publishing in an open-access context allows you to retain all copyright over your research and make your work available to the widest possible audience. The Directory of Open-Access Journals lists over 5,500 open-access scholarly journals in a wide variety of disciplines.