Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-6-2018
Publication Title
The Review of English Studies
Pages
23
Abstract
The Lay Folks’ Catechism is an English rendering of injunctions issued in 1357 by John Thoresby, Archbishop of York, setting forth the elements of Christian belief. Ever since W. W. Skeat’s treatments, the Catechism has been placed in the general orbit of alliterative verse, yet closer identifications have proved elusive. The text is now recorded in both The Index of Middle English Verse and The Index of Middle English Prose; the principal stylistic study proposes that John Gaytryge, the author of the English text, may have been influenced by the system of Latin prose rhythm known as cursus. Renewed treatment must begin by establishing an accurate and authoritative text. Collation of the two best copies, York, Borthwick Institute, MS Abp Reg 11 and Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Don.c.13, confirms the general authority of the York copy. Recent studies of alliterative metre allow Gaytryge’s composition to be distinguished with confidence from that English verse form. Affiliations to Latin cursus are more difficult to assess, but doubtful: more likely influences are the Latin of the Creed, Pater noster, and other pastoralia, and the plain style that preachers were instructed to adopt in preaching to the laity. The form of the Catechism may have been a deliberate innovation: a new plain style in the vernacular, aiming to embody the priorities of pastoral instruction.
Recommended Citation
Cornelius, Ian. The Lay Folks’ Catechism, Alliterative Verse, and Cursus. The Review of English Studies, , : 23, 2018. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, English: Faculty Publications and Other Works, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgy107
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
© The Author 2018
Comments
Author Posting. © The Author 2018. This article is posted here by permission of Oxford Academic for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in The Review of English Studies, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgy107