Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-15-2017
Publication Title
Business Strategy and the Environment
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
128-151
Abstract
Companies commonly issue sustainability or corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. This study seeks to understand worldviews of corporate sustainability, or the corporate message conveyed regarding what sustainability or CSR is and how to enact it. Content analysis of corporate sustainability reports is used to position each company report within stages of corporate sustainability. Results reveal that there are multiple coexisting worldviews of corporate sustainability, but the most dominant worldview is focused on the business case for sustainability, a position anchored in the weak sustainability paradigm. We contend that the business case and weak sustainability advanced in corporate sustainability reports and by the Global Reporting Initiative are poor representations of sustainability. Ecological embeddedness, or a locally responsive strategy that is sensitive to local ecosystems, may hold the key to improved ecological sensemaking, which in turn could lead to more mature levels of corporate sustainability worldviews that support strong sustainability and are rooted in environmental science. This must be supported by government regulation.
Recommended Citation
Landrum, Nancy E. and Ohsowski, Brian M.. Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1: 128-151, 2017. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, School of Environmental Sustainability: Faculty Publications and Other Works, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
© John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment 2017
Comments
Author Posting. © John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment 2017. This article is posted here by permission of John Wiley & Sons for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 27, no. 1, 2017, http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989