Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-23-2021
Publication Title
Critical Perspectives on International Business
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
599-618
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to highlight differences between business and non-business literature regarding base of the pyramid (BoP) and subsistence contexts and reveal discourse’s powerful role in influencing goals, solutions and outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses critical discourse analysis to review a convenience sample of business versus non-business literature on the BoP and subsistence contexts.
Findings – Discourse used in business literature on the BoP is oriented toward hegemonic Western capitalist approaches that result in the depletion of resources, resource inequalities, poverty and increased consumption, dependence and environmental degradation and, therefore, cannot alleviate poverty.
Research limitations/implications – There are two primary limitations: the study relied on a convenience sample that was not random and comparatively, the business BoP literature is not as mature as the non-business subsistence literature and, therefore, the BoP field of study is not yet fully developed.
Practical implications – Discourse has a powerful role in revealing assumptions and guiding actions. A change in BoP discourse toward a strength-based approach can serve as a model of sustainability and can help powerful entities enact structural and systemic change.
Originality/value – This paper reveals the role of discourse in business BoP literature and how it perpetuates and even exacerbates the problems they were designed to alleviate: depletion of resources, resource inequalities, poverty and increased consumption, dependence and environmental degradation. The paper challenges researchers, economists and powerful guiding entities to reorient their discourse of the BoP to be more aligned with those of non-business researchers of subsistence markets.
Identifier
1742-2043
Recommended Citation
Landrum, N.E. (2021), "A critical discourse analysis to explain the failure of BoP strategies", Critical Perspectives on International Business, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2018-0066
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
© 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited
Included in
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, International Business Commons
Comments
Author Posting. © Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Emerald Publishing Limited for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Critical Perspectives on International Business (2021), https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-08-2018-0066