Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2014
Publication Title
Cross-Cultural Communication
Volume
10
Issue
2
Abstract
Human stereotypes are more complicated and subtle than scholars or lay people often think. Based on the EPA (i.e., evaluation, potency and accuracy) theory of stereotypes (Lee, 2011; Lee, B., W. & Luo, 2007; Lee, J., & McCauley, 2013; Lee, McCauley & Jussim, 2013; Lee, V. S., & Ma, 2007), it was hypothesized and found that stereotypes of Asian Americans are derived on the basis of both evaluative considerations (prejudice) and a realistic assessment of group characteristics. This produces a pattern of stereotypic judgments that contains both agreement and disagreement when comparing stereotypes of Asian Americans among different perceiver groups (European Americans, non-Asian MinorityAmericans). The results of the present study also highlight complexities that arise when one considers the effect of inter-group contact on stereotyping. Specifically, an increase in the frequency of inter-group contact was associated with a reduction in negative stereotyping, whereas an increase in the quality or closeness of intergroup contact was associated with an increase in negative stereotyping. It is concluded that inter-group stereotyping reflects a complex mixture of psychological processes that are in need of further investigation.
Recommended Citation
Yueh-Ting Lee, Victor C. Ottati, Canchu Lin, Sydney Xinni Chan (2014). How Are Asian Americans Seen and Evaluated? ExaminingEthnic Stereotypes and their Cultural Complexity. Cross-Cultural Communication, 10(2), 98-111. Available from: http//www.cscanada.net/index.php/ccc/article/view/4625 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/4625
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
© Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture, 2014.
Comments
Author Posting. © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture, 2014. This article is posted here by permission of the Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in Cross-Cultural Communication, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fg5803