Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-14-2019
Publication Title
Trends in Classics
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
11-33
Publisher Name
De Gruyter
Abstract
In recent years, much progress has been made towards elucidating the function of ekphrasis in Roman epistolography, especially with relation to the writings of Seneca and Pliny. Following on from these precedents, this article mines the epistles of three prominent Roman letter-writers, Cicero, Horace, and Ovid, for their intermedial elements. The motifs of oral quotations, handwriting, and human tear stains, which interweave the sources analysed, are shown not only to straddle the borders between distinct media, but also to engage with multiple senses as a result of their multiple medialities. Oral quotations integrate speech into written texts and thus necessitate both sight and hearing. Handwriting likewise consists of both a ‘basic mediality’ – the visual – and a ‘qualified mediality’ of chirographic distinctiveness, and thus necessitates not only perception via sight but also recognition. Tear stains, which range from the actual smudges in Cicero’s missives to metaphorical ones in Tears don’t feature in Horace’s letters. Ovid’s epistles, are in turn geared both towards sight and touch, since they simultaneously alter the letter’s appearance and surface. However, these intermedial connections have different effects in prose and poetry epistles: they enable the former to transcend the very category of ‘letter’, but confine the latter within the epistolary genre by characterising them in material terms.
Recommended Citation
Mannering, Jonathan E.. Sensorial Intermedialities in Roman Letters: Cicero, Horace, and Ovid. Trends in Classics, 11, 1: 11-33, 2019. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Classical Studies: Faculty Publications and Other Works, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tc-2019-0002
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
Author Posting © De Gruyter, 2019.
Comments
Author Posting © De Gruyter, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of De Gruyter for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in Trends in Classics, Volume 11, Issue 1, September 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2019-0002