Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2019
Publication Title
Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
27–47
Publisher Name
The Association of Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors
Abstract
The advanced standing model of social work education, which affords graduate credit to qualified BSW students who pursue their MSW, has not been without issue or controversy, including questions of potential differences in performance on various educational outcomes. Specifically related to research curriculum, the importance of which is often not wholly embraced by students, this article reports the results of a secondary data analysis comparing research knowledge among advanced standing and traditional MSW students as well as among the various undergraduate majors (i.e., BSW, psychology, and sociology). Results suggest that research knowledge is similar and low across student subgroups. Important differences in research knowledge were found among student groups based on undergraduate major, with BSW undergraduates without advanced standing, on average, scoring lower than any other group. Implications for BSW research curriculum are considered
Recommended Citation
Charles, Jennifer L. K.; Perkins, Nathan H.; Ward, Christopher J.; Stewart, Melissa L.; and Secret, Mary C.. Research Knowledge of Advanced Standing and Traditional Students: Implications for BSW Education. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 24, 1: 27–47, 2019. Retrieved from Loyola eCommons, Social Work: School of Social Work Faculty Publications and Other Works, http://dx.doi.org/10.18084/1084-7219.24.1.27
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Copyright Statement
© The Association of Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors, 2019.
Comments
Author Posting © The Association of Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors, 2019. This article is posted here by permission of The Association of Baccalaureate Social Work Program Directors for personal use, not for redistribution. The article was published in Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2019, https://doi.org/10.18084/1084-7219.24.1.27